HARRY POTTER ============ The Press, Christchurch, Sat 24 Nov 2001 In a few words: Ten schools are interested in backing the Harry Potter film, by encouraging attendance (November 6). But this film is about witchcraft and occult practices, sorcery, magic, and spells. What are the long-term effects on our children? This is not harmless fun. This is serious. Have we lost the art of discerning between good and evil? Margaret Boyne The Press, Christchurch, Tue 27 Nov 2001 Letters to the editor: Harry Potter Sir--A thousand thank-yous to Margaret Boyne (November 24) for alerting me to the dangers of indulging my children's imagination in the fantasy that is Harry Potter. It is only through her measured and balanced view of this latest phenomenon sweeping the world that I have recognised the fine line between education and the occult. Accordingly, I have withdrawn those age-old favourites, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Sleeping Beauty, Hansel and Gretel, and Cinderella from my children's book-cases because all these stories have magical spells, evil fairies, and wicked witches in them, and I am only just beginning in my crusade. I look forward to the rest of Christchurch's young parents and pre-school teachers joining me in the book-burning ceremony that I am planning to hold on Boxing Day, to purge ourselves of the blight that is infecting our society. Peter Curnow November 24, 2001 The Press, Christchurch, Thu 29 Nov 2001 Letters to the editor: Harry Potter Sir--In reference to the satirical (at least I hope it is satirical) letter from P. Curnow (November 27), I find it ironic that fundamentalists condemn Harry Potter for being "occult" and unsuitable for children yet regard the Bible as viable (indeed, mandatory) reading for the young. They seem blind to the fact that the sacred text dwells in lurid detail on such wholesome topics as incest, child abuse, child murder, demons, witches, nakedness, drunkenness, sexual uncleanliness, and where one has to put one's ejaculate. One can hardly turn a page in the Old Testament without finding the central characters being murdered or mutilated. Rather than deny kids a read of Harry Potter, perhaps we should be limiting their exposure to this schizophrenic fundamentalist hypocrisy. I doubt, after all, that Harry would hijack a broomstick and crash it into the nearest public building. Darren A. Saunders November 27, 2001 The Press, Christchurch, Fri 14 Dec 2001 Letters to the editor: Harry Potter Sir--J.K. Rowling has achieved a wonderful thing: getting boys to read. Reading is highly important for literacy levels and is an immensely satisfaying experience whose greatness cannot be overstated. The books are written elegantly with delightful charm and sophistication, they have exciting plots, tightly wrought emotions and are free from American colloquialisms which blight other works. They also promote good against evil. As for the accusations of Harry Potter promoting an occult world of wickedness and sorcery, and being a dangerous obsession, one must not lose sight that it is a childrens' book. More dangerous is the dogmatic adherence to the Bible, another fiction book, but far less entertaining. Such criticisms of J.K. Rowling's works constitute an affront to the great Albus Dumbledore himself. William Fussey Oxford, December 11